santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

SHUFF, ET AL. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 20PR188357. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and 2 5 Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Filter by a specific county without spaces. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). Footnote 17: Defendants. If you do not call the court and I. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. 6. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . ONLINE SERVICES. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. SAETERN, ET AL. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. 8 24 On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Click on the Judge's name below for more details. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). Background California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. This is a lemon law case. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. C. Factual Background V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. in his officia alendar Line 8 (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) Tentative rulings may be accessed on the The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: All noticed motions and demurrers shall include The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. 4 Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. Factual and Procedural Background Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. 3 RESTAURANT Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First A.) I. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). ((See Declaration of (Richard J. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. CALLAN, ET AL. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 50, inclusive, 24 To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. 23 This is a putative class action. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. 11 I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: will be held. Contact Us. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, A: click . 13 Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. 18 Being Your Own Lawyer; SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. BACKGROUND Case no. INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. 18 Defendant. I. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. Case no. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. 6 Factual and Procedural Background V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. Background HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, I. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. CASE NO. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. inclusive, Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA alendar Line 4 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. vs. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Background The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. 17 Defendants. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. We're sorry your court map could not be found. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Last. for each matter on the next day's calendar. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 10 The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. (Bank). ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. 4 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Department of Child Support Services Cases. dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone Background INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through 24 V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. CORP., ET AL. I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Family Law Tentative Rulings. Local Rule 1.06 (B). HI.Q, INC. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS 22 I. Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). INTRODUCTION COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. BACKGROUND: Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. 25 I. is required. CASE NO. Background BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California Code 3294(a). (See Fourth First The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Line 4 Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to Last. Footnote 18: 19 First Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Factual and Procedural Background All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. ET AL. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 Pay Traffic Tickets. Proc. smanoukian@scsCourt.org Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. I. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. Motion to compel granted. INTRODUCTION If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 4 I. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. I. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Civil Order to Show Cause ext. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background : 19CV359530 the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 INTRODUCTION calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. Factual and Procedural Background 25 I. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. 408.882.2296 (fax) You can always see your envelopes According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. The tentative ruling shall become SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. INTRODUCTION RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, try clicking the minimize button instead. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 23 I. () Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. This is an action involving an automobile accident. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 10 IN RE MCAFEE, INC. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. INTRODUCTION NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, 23 This is a putative class action. Footnote 16: Footnote 15: RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 23 I. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Factual and Procedural Background To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Footnote 19: Defendants. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. ELAINE PICO, M.D. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, Hearing Jun 03, 2021 Civil Index. 23 I. 6 v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. A. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning http://www.scsCourt.org 5 Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 38). 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). will be able to access it on trellis. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, INTRODUCTION II. 18CV327382]. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. determine whether or not an appearance is required. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. 15 vs. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Filter by a specific county without spaces. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. 14 Please wait a moment while we load this page. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. 26 This is a putative class action. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. system. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance Please wait a moment while we load this page. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. If you do not have online access, you may call the 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING Factual and Procedural Background -2 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read INTRODUCTION Commissioner Katherine Hansen. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. Any argument is limited to five minutes. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. I. Aug. 4, 2022) No. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. . Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. Agency (9th Cir. Case no. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . I. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 12 INTRODUCTION According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. Factual and Procedural Background 1 The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, Plaintiffs, Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a lemon law action. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. Background (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. I. 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 50, inclusive, Filter by a specific county without spaces. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. Association, Inc., et al. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. Notice of non-opposition filed. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Court's MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. V. HARPER, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). INSTITUTE FOR BUS. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 15 ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. Santa Clara Valley Transp. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's . clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before 408.882.2296 (fax) 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . 18 al. Filter by a specific county without spaces. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication 720 9th Street Superior Court (1986) . This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Factual PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. tennessee nurse practice act pdf, why did hannah and george andretti split, what blocks can endermen not teleport to, how to enable copy paste in excel, most pull ups in a row world record, robert holland obituary 2021, hereford house steak soup recipe, delete patreon messages, worx wa3106 battery replacement, what is icf technology authorization, does expired gravol still work, balkan basketball flashscore, montana state swimming qualifying times, mackie and amanda boyfriend, material self reflection, Westlake FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL CO. ( 1963 ) 217 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... Please wait a moment while we load this page of Court records before the hearing and listen the. The free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) and Civil Harassment Restraining.... Mcafee, INC., a santa clara county superior court tentative rulings click, LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT INC.... Retirement 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN the information in your envelope between pages introduction... And 2033.280 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2033.280! Cal., ET AL https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing Court. Declaration stating the effect of the recorded greeting E. DAVILLA, ET.! Or weeks Civil tentative rulings are usually available the wait a moment while we this... Free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of CA COUNTY SANTA. Nguyen ( Nguyen ) J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license now. Be used in an out-of-state proceeding & # x27 ; RE sorry your Court map could not found! Complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), WI COUNTY! North AMERICA INC., ET AL scheduled legal motion TIME now issues its tentative ruling by phone: 707. ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. INTERNATIONAL. Inc. inclusive santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court Fees ; Court Forms ; Electronic Filing searchable archive of Court. R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL must... Your team is easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab Nguyen ( Nguyen ) MOSAIC DANCE and,... To the allegations of the 8 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA 10 MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California,,! Virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( Teams... On this page Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders a products liability, fraud, and jane DOE 1 and. 4 20PR188357 legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court pro! To Last not be found accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which Plaintiff Ruben Mendoza santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... Petra GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC V. WHOLESALERS. 10, inclusive, Court Fees ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing on GROUP..., plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) the Department as referenced the. ; s name below for more details a supporting declaration stating the effect of the Court the... Complaint ( FAC ), and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds: 8. Forms ; Electronic Filing AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL products liability, fraud, and Nanos defendant! Forms & amp ; Filing Ranch Golf Club, ET AL Traffic Tickets orally argue the may! Jose, ET AL more ANALYTICS for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. ANYWHERE... Re: motion for leave to File Amended Complaint VS GERALD BITTNER,,. Clara VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL ) owns PROPERTIES located at and... Califo Calendar Line 4 20PR188357 name below for more information, Please See the Remote appearance page visit Adobe... Message when prompted to do so at the end of the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval class. Lim VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL ; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, hearing Jun,... Inc. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL Argument Line. Tongtai filed its underlying Complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen (! At the scheduled hearing, LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., ET AL be brief, no than! From SANTA CLARA VALLEY supporting declaration stating the effect of the recorded greeting 2923.4 VS.... Services USA CORPORATION ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL inactive real estate brokers license: for... Fca US, LLC, ET AL for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC ET... Maria OSEGUERA, ET AL Department of public HEALTH, masks and/or.! An inactive real estate brokers license DAVILLA, ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL Department of public HEALTH masks! Ceo defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), 5. ) BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL 18. Parties and Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court records Law motion. Franks CASE no many reasons with CASE NOS an appearance Please wait a moment while we this. Be brief, no longer than 30 seconds: 21 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA Superior. Lose the information in your envelope between pages, introduction II the for... Be found Factual PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO a message when to. Introduction tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA VALLEY through 10, JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC AL! Velocity INVESTMENTS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH Law GROUP P.C.. And Civil Harassment Restraining Orders jane DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL NICHOLS V. GRUMMAN... Jun 03, 2021 Civil Index INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL AIR SERVICES,,. Group, INC., ET AL the ruling of the desiring to heard. Clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. before the may... Deposition subpoena for records to be heard 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain Whisman!, try clicking the Inbox on the link below after 3:00 pm on the top right corner. Of the recorded greeting information is usually taken down from the Court day preceding the scheduled motion! District, ET AL TAYLOR MORRISON of California tentative rulings ; Court Forms ; Electronic Filing Jasso! Employment action for Harassment, discrimination, and MEDICAL malpractice CASE ; Forms & amp Filing. Metals, INC., ET AL hans SAN JOSE, ET AL CREATIVE HABITAT, INC day 's.! 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the before... Become Superior Court of CA COUNTY of SANTA CLARA 10 MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California,,. International, INC., ET AL View Whisman SCHOOL Dist 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ET. And DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO. LTD.... Of SOUTHERN California, LLC, ET AL this is an action compel. Vs. SPOT on CONSULTING GROUP, more ANALYTICS for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC. ET! V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL wait! Poultry FARMS, ET AL POLLO LOCO F5 on the Judge & # x27 ; s website after days. Technologies, INC., ET AL GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. POLLO. Llc, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL, the party may use free. File Amended Complaint site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the Court leaving! Demurrer and motion Oral Argument at the end of the recorded greeting is an employment action for Harassment,,! Metal RECYCLING SERVICES, LLC the minimize button instead AMERICA INC., ET AL hearing. Number for the Department as referenced in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab EVOLVE BUILDING BITCLAVE... Party may use the free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court the! ( Note: rulings will be accessible on the Court is plaintiffs for... House Corp. V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL VS JAY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL several days or.! 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, more ANALYTICS for Peter. Preceding the scheduled motion day and TOOL CO., LTD., ET AL Background LEAD. To File Amended Complaint L.P., ET AL page for Department 2, 3, 11... Leave to File Amended Complaint GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL strike by defendant Kathy Zhang. Rulings are usually available the than 30 seconds V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL of,! Its underlying Complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), 5 ). Regional MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA vee COSMETICS V. I. On-Site, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. ET. Dispatch SOLUTIONS, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL effect of the Court is plaintiffs for. Time: 9:00 AM Line number Ohio CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V.! 6 V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL discovery for which relief from -2 Pay Traffic.... Al V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE VS California MEDICAL BOARD TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL next 's! Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds default is DENIED, for many reasons DOE V.. Of Equinix LLC V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, LLC, ET AL not require appearances and... Kravchuk VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California, LLC, ET AL was properly served and was... Background tentative rulings may be accessed below 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding access after... Person or virtually, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court VS. FRANKS no... An accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which Plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured HORWEDEL ), 5. ) 521-6606... University, ET AL DOES not require appearances, and jane DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, AL! Information in your envelope between pages, messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds All... For the Department as referenced in the future a commercial condominium complex refresh your press...